Mazda Premacy 2001 vs Nissan Almera Tino 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.8 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 - 131 HP | 112 - 136 HP | |
Torque: | 152 - 230 NM | 163 - 304 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 12.1 seconds | 10.5 - 14.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 9.4 | 6.4 - 9.3 | |
Mazda Premacy petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Almera Tino. On average, Mazda Premacy equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera Tino. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.34 m | 4.26 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.60 m | 1.61 m | |
Mazda Premacy is 8 cm longer than the Nissan Almera Tino, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Premacy is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 440 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1848 litres | 1950 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Mazda Premacy has 20 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Almera Tino. This could mean that the Mazda Premacy uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera Tino (by 102 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda Premacy is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan Almera Tino. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`799 | ~ 1`908 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Premacy has
|
Nissan Almera Tino has
| |