Mazda Premacy 2001 vs Ford C-Max 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 131 HP | 90 - 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 - 230 NM | 145 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 12.1 seconds | 9.6 - 12.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 9.4 | 4.9 - 8.3 | |
|
Mazda Premacy petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford C-Max. On average, Mazda Premacy equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.60 m | |
| Mazda Premacy and Ford C-Max are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1848 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Mazda Premacy has 130 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Premacy (by 228 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Premacy is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`799 | ~ 1`958 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Premacy has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |