Mazda MX-3 1994 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 132 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda MX-3 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda MX-3 engine produces 10 HP more power than Volvo V40, but torque is 60 NM less than Volvo V40. Thanks to more power Mazda MX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 5.4 | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda MX-3 consumes 4.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda MX-3 could require 615 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mazda MX-3 is smaller. Mazda MX-3 is 15 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-3 is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 289 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Mazda MX-3 has 46 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MX-3 is 1 metres less than that of the Volvo V40, which means Mazda MX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`540 | 1`965 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-3 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |