Mazda MX-3 1991 vs Volvo V40 2016

 
Mazda MX-3
1991 - 1994
Volvo V40
2016 -
Body: CoupeHatchback
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 90 HP152 HP
Torque: 135 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds8.3 seconds
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda MX-3 engine produces 62 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 115 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Mazda MX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.4no data
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres62 litres
610 km with real consumption810 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.37 m
Width: 1.70 m1.80 m
Height: 1.31 m1.44 m
Mazda MX-3 is smaller.
Mazda MX-3 is 15 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-3 is 13 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 289 litres324 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1500 litres
Volvo V40 has more luggage space.
Mazda MX-3 has 35 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda MX-3 is 1 metres less than that of the Volvo V40, which means Mazda MX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`475no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 100011 400
Pros and Cons: Mazda MX-3 has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Volvo V40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • electric power steering
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv