Mazda MX-3 1994 vs Toyota Yaris 2007
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 NM | 173 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota Yaris is a more dynamic driving. Mazda MX-3 engine produces 23 HP less power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 36 NM less than Toyota Yaris. Due to the lower power, Mazda MX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda MX-3 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that by driving the Mazda MX-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda MX-3 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda MX-3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda MX-3 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda Xedos 6 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Yaris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mazda MX-3 1994 1.6 engine: This engine is widely regarded as reliable, though it can develop certain issues over time. One of the most common problems is increased oil consumption, often starting after 120,000 km. This is frequently ... More about Mazda MX-3 1994 1.6 engine Toyota Yaris 2007 1.8 engine: This engine is generally considered decent, with a lifespan of around 250,000 km. While it doesn’t cause major issues if properly maintained, some common problems still arise. One of the most frequent ... More about Toyota Yaris 2007 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.53 m | |
| Mazda MX-3 is 42 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda MX-3 is 22 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 135 litres | 275 litres | |
|
Toyota Yaris has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda MX-3 has 140 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. This could mean that the Mazda MX-3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MX-3 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Mazda MX-3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`430 | 1`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-3 has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |