Mazda MX-3 1994 vs SAAB 900 1994

 
Mazda MX-3
1994 - 1998
SAAB 900
1994 - 1998
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 110 HP130 HP
Torque: 137 NM177 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds10.5 seconds
Mazda MX-3 engine produces 20 HP less power than SAAB 900, whereas torque is 40 NM less than SAAB 900.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.910.9
The Mazda MX-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda MX-3 consumes 4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 900, which means that by driving the Mazda MX-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 600 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres68 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway830 km on highway
Mazda MX-3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a SAAB 900 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 16 years6 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda Xedos 6, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato, Kia CarensInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including SAAB 9-3, SAAB 9000
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda MX-3 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.64 m
Width: 1.70 m1.71 m
Height: 1.31 m1.44 m
Mazda MX-3 is smaller.
Mazda MX-3 is 42 cm shorter than the SAAB 900, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-3 is 13 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 135 litresno data
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda MX-3 is 0.7 metres less than that of the SAAB 900, which means Mazda MX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4301`600
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 10001000
Pros and Cons: Mazda MX-3 has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
SAAB 900 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv