Mazda MX-3 1994 vs Mazda MX-5 2006

 
Mazda MX-3
1994 - 1998
Mazda MX-5
2006 - 2009
Body: CoupeCabrio
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 110 HP126 HP
Torque: 137 NM167 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds9.6 seconds
Mazda MX-5 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda MX-3 engine produces 16 HP less power than Mazda MX-5, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Mazda MX-5. Due to the lower power, Mazda MX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.97.3
Real fuel consumption: 8.1 l/100km8.3 l/100km
By specification Mazda MX-3 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-5, which means that by driving the Mazda MX-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda MX-3 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-5.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway860 km on highway
610 km with real consumption600 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda MX-3) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mazda MX-5) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km380'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 16 years16 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda Xedos 6Used only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda MX-3 might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Mazda MX-3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Mazda MX-3 1994 1.6 engine: This engine is widely regarded as reliable, though it can develop certain issues over time. One of the most common problems is increased oil consumption, often starting after 120,000 km. This is frequently ...  More about Mazda MX-3 1994 1.6 engine 

Mazda MX-5 2006 1.8 engine: The engine often has unstable idling speeds and problems with the thermostat.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.00 m
Width: 1.70 m1.72 m
Height: 1.31 m1.26 m
Mazda MX-3 is 22 cm longer than the Mazda MX-5, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-3 is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 135 litres150 litres
Despite its longer length, Mazda MX-3 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Mazda MX-5. This could mean that the Mazda MX-3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda MX-3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda MX-5.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4301`355
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 10005400
Pros and Cons: Mazda MX-3 has
  • timing belt engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Mazda MX-5 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv