Mazda MX-3 1994 vs Honda CRX 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 NM | 142 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Honda CRX is a more dynamic driving. Mazda MX-3 engine produces 15 HP less power than Honda CRX, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Honda CRX. Due to the lower power, Mazda MX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda MX-3 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CRX, which means that by driving the Mazda MX-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda MX-3 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CRX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda MX-3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.26 m | |
| Mazda MX-3 is 22 cm longer than the Honda CRX, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda MX-3 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 135 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MX-3 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Honda CRX, which means Mazda MX-3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`430 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-3 has
|
Honda CRX has
| |