Mazda MX-3 1994 vs Ford Puma 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
| Mazda MX-3 engine produces 7 HP more power than Ford Puma, but torque is 8 NM less than Ford Puma. Despite the higher power, Mazda MX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.3 | |
|
The Mazda MX-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda MX-3 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Puma, which means that by driving the Mazda MX-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 660 km on highway | ||
| Mazda MX-3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Mazda MX-3 1994 1.6 engine: This engine is widely regarded as reliable, though it can develop certain issues over time. One of the most common problems is increased oil consumption, often starting after 120,000 km. This is frequently ... More about Mazda MX-3 1994 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 3.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Mazda MX-3 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda MX-3 is 24 cm longer than the Ford Puma, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda MX-3 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 135 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MX-3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Puma. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`430 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-3 has
|
| |