Mazda MX-3 1994 vs Ford Puma 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 NM | 122 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda MX-3 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda MX-3 engine produces 20 HP more power than Ford Puma, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Ford Puma. Thanks to more power Mazda MX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Puma is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mazda MX-3 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Puma, which means that by driving the Mazda MX-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda MX-3 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Puma. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda MX-3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mazda MX-3 1994 1.6 engine: This engine is widely regarded as reliable, though it can develop certain issues over time. One of the most common problems is increased oil consumption, often starting after 120,000 km. This is frequently ... More about Mazda MX-3 1994 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 3.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Mazda MX-3 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda MX-3 is 24 cm longer than the Ford Puma, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda MX-3 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 135 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MX-3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Puma. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`430 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-3 has
|
| |