Mazda MX-3 1991 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.6 - 1.8 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 135 HP | 146 HP | |
Torque: | 135 - 160 NM | 177 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 10.5 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 9.5 | 9.7 | |
Mazda MX-3 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Eclipse. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.22 m | 4.38 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.31 m | 1.30 m | |
Mazda MX-3 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda MX-3 is 16 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Eclipse, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-3 is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 289 litres | 241 litres | |
Mazda MX-3 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda MX-3 has 48 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Eclipse. The Mitsubishi Eclipse may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda MX-3 is 1.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Eclipse, which means Mazda MX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`474 | ~ 1`750 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-3 has
|
| |