Mazda MX-3 1991 vs Toyota Celica 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Mazda MX-3 is available only with front wheel drive, while Toyota Celica can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.6 - 1.8 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 135 HP | 116 - 242 HP | |
Torque: | 135 - 160 NM | 154 - 302 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 10.5 seconds | 6.1 - 10.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 9.5 | 7.9 - 9.5 | |
Mazda MX-3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Celica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.22 m | 4.42 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.31 m | 1.30 m | |
Mazda MX-3 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda MX-3 is 20 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-3 is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 289 litres | 283 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Mazda MX-3 has 6 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Celica. The Toyota Celica may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda MX-3 is 1.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Mazda MX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`474 | ~ 1`635 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-3 has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |