Mazda MX-3 1991 vs Toyota Celica 1994

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda MX-3
1991 - 1998
Toyota Celica
1994 - 1999
Gearbox: Manual Manual
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mazda MX-3 is available only with front wheel drive, while Toyota Celica can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.6 - 1.81.8 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 90 - 135 HP116 - 242 HP
Torque: 135 - 160 NM154 - 302 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 - 10.5 seconds6.1 - 10.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.9 - 9.57.9 - 9.5
Mazda MX-3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Celica.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.42 m
Width: 1.70 m1.75 m
Height: 1.31 m1.30 m
Mazda MX-3 is smaller, but slightly higher.
Mazda MX-3 is 20 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-3 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 289 litres283 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Mazda MX-3 has 6 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Celica. The Toyota Celica may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda MX-3 is 1.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Mazda MX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`474~ 1`635
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 10002000
Pros and Cons: Mazda MX-3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Toyota Celica has
  • available with 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv