Mazda MX-3 1991 vs Nissan 200 SX 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Mazda MX-3 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Nissan 200 SX has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Mazda MX-3 is available with front wheel drive, while Nissan 200 SX can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.6 - 1.8 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 135 HP | 200 HP | |
Torque: | 135 - 160 NM | 265 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 10.5 seconds | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 9.5 | 8.8 - 9.3 | |
Mazda MX-3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan 200 SX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.22 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.31 m | 1.30 m | |
Mazda MX-3 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda MX-3 is 30 cm shorter than the Nissan 200 SX, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-3 is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 289 litres | 307 litres | |
Mazda MX-3 has 18 litres less trunk space than the Nissan 200 SX. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda MX-3 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan 200 SX. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`474 | ~ 1`780 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-3 has
|
Nissan 200 SX has
| |