Mazda MX-3 1991 vs Nissan 200 SX 1994

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda MX-3
1991 - 1998
Nissan 200 SX
1994 - 1997
Gearbox: Manual Manual/Automatic
Mazda MX-3 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Nissan 200 SX has both automatic and manual transmission options.
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Mazda MX-3 is available with front wheel drive, while Nissan 200 SX can be equipped with rear wheel drive.
Engines: 1.6 - 1.82.0

Performance

Power: 90 - 135 HP200 HP
Torque: 135 - 160 NM265 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 - 10.5 seconds7.5 - 8.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.9 - 9.58.8 - 9.3
Mazda MX-3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan 200 SX.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.52 m
Width: 1.70 m1.73 m
Height: 1.31 m1.30 m
Mazda MX-3 is smaller, but slightly higher.
Mazda MX-3 is 30 cm shorter than the Nissan 200 SX, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-3 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 289 litres307 litres
Mazda MX-3 has 18 litres less trunk space than the Nissan 200 SX.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters9.6 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda MX-3 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan 200 SX.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`474~ 1`780
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 1000no data
Pros and Cons: Mazda MX-3 has
  • manual gearbox only
  • lower fuel consumption
Nissan 200 SX has
  • both manual and automatic
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv