Mazda CX-7 2007 vs Volvo XC60 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-7 engine produces 25 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-7 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 11.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 12.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda CX-7 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-7 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-7 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda CX-7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.71 m | |
| Mazda CX-7 is 5 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-7 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
774 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-7 has 40 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. This could mean that the Mazda CX-7 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 681 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-7 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Mazda CX-7 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`301 | 2`440 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 8000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 7.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-7 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |