Mazda CX-7 2007 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mazda CX-7) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Jeep Grand Cherokee) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-7 engine produces 42 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 130 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-7 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda CX-7 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-7 could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-7 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.74 m | |
| Mazda CX-7 is 7 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-7 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
774 litres | 1909 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Mazda CX-7 has 523 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 1135 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-7 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`301 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-7 has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |