Mazda CX-7 2007 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-7 engine produces 110 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 188 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-7 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda CX-7 consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-7 could require 420 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-7 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Honda CR-V 2007 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda CX-7 is 16 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-7 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
774 litres | 955 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-7 has 101 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Mazda CX-7 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 181 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-7 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mazda CX-7 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`301 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 5200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-7 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |