Mazda CX-7 2007 vs Peugeot 4007 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mazda CX-7) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Peugeot 4007) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-7 engine produces 104 HP more power than Peugeot 4007, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-7 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 4007 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda CX-7 consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 4007, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-7 could require 570 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-7 consumes 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 4007. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 4007 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda CX-7 is 4 cm longer than the Peugeot 4007, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-7 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
774 litres | 1686 litres | |
|
Peugeot 4007 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda CX-7 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 4007 (by 912 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-7 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Peugeot 4007, which means Mazda CX-7 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`301 kg | 2`410 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`740 kg | 1`790 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 561 kg | 620 kg | |
| Mazda CX-7 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem less than Peugeot 4007. Therefore, Peugeot 4007 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-7 has
|
Peugeot 4007 has
| |