Mazda CX-7 2007 vs Opel Antara 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mazda CX-7) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Opel Antara) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-7 engine produces 110 HP more power than Opel Antara, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Opel Antara. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-7 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Antara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda CX-7 consumes 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-7 could require 525 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-7 consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Antara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is larger, but lower. Mazda CX-7 is 10 cm longer than the Opel Antara, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-7 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
774 litres | 1420 litres | |
| Mazda CX-7 has 85 litres more trunk space than the Opel Antara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Antara (by 646 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-7 is 1 metres less than that of the Opel Antara, which means Mazda CX-7 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`301 kg | 2`225 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`740 kg | 1`805 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 561 kg | 420 kg | |
| Mazda CX-7 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 25 procentiem more than Opel Antara. Therefore, Mazda CX-7 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 4000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-7 has
|
Opel Antara has
| |