Mazda CX-7 2007 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-7 engine produces 110 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-7 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda CX-7 consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-7 could require 435 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-7 consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Nissan X-Trail 2007 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda CX-7 is 5 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 9 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-7 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
774 litres | 1742 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-7 has 24 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. This could mean that the Mazda CX-7 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 968 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-7 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Mazda CX-7 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`301 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 4600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-7 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |