Mazda CX-7 2007 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 269 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 385 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-7 engine produces 9 HP less power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Nissan Pathfinder. Despite less power, Mazda CX-7 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 13.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 15.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda CX-7 consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-7 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-7 consumes 3.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 510 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.78 m | |
| Mazda CX-7 is 6 cm shorter than the Nissan Pathfinder, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-7 is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 515 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 515 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 455 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
774 litres | 2091 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 1317 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-7 is 1 metres less than that of the Nissan Pathfinder, which means Mazda CX-7 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`301 kg | 2`793 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`740 kg | 2`132 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 561 kg | 661 kg | |
| Mazda CX-7 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem less than Nissan Pathfinder. Therefore, Nissan Pathfinder is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-7 has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |