Mazda CX-7 2007 vs Citroen C-Crosser 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 232 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-7 engine produces 90 HP more power than Citroen C-Crosser, whereas torque is 148 NM more than Citroen C-Crosser. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-7 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 9.3 | |
|
The Citroen C-Crosser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-7 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Crosser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-7 could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda CX-7 is 3 cm longer than the Citroen C-Crosser, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-7 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 184 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 184 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 455 litres | 441 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
774 litres | 1686 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Mazda CX-7 has more luggage space (by 14 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C-Crosser (by 912 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-7 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen C-Crosser, which means Mazda CX-7 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`301 | 2`410 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-7 has
|
Citroen C-Crosser has
| |