Mazda CX-7 2007 vs Citroen C-Crosser 2007

 
Mazda CX-7
2007 - 2009
Citroen C-Crosser
2007 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.3 Petrol2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 260 HP156 HP
Torque: 380 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.9 seconds9.9 seconds
Mazda CX-7 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda CX-7 engine produces 104 HP more power than Citroen C-Crosser, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-7 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.07.2
Real fuel consumption: 11.8 l/100km8.1 l/100km
The Citroen C-Crosser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda CX-7 consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Crosser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-7 could require 570 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-7 consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Crosser.
Fuel tank capacity: 69 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 620 km in combined cycle830 km in combined cycle
820 km on highway1010 km on highway
580 km with real consumption740 km with real consumption
Citroen C-Crosser gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Mazda CX-7 has 4x4: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive.

Dimensions

Length: 4.68 m4.65 m
Width: 1.87 m1.81 m
Height: 1.64 m1.67 m
Mazda CX-7 is larger, but slightly lower.
Mazda CX-7 is 3 cm longer than the Citroen C-Crosser, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-7 is 3 cm lower.
Seats: 5 seats7 seats
Trunk capacity: 455 litres184 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data184 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 455 litres441 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
774 litres1686 litres
In 5-seat version Mazda CX-7 has more luggage space (by 14 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C-Crosser (by 912 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-7 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen C-Crosser, which means Mazda CX-7 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`3012`410
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 36006400
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-7 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Citroen C-Crosser has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv