Mazda CX-7 2007 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mazda CX-7) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Chevrolet Captiva) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-7 engine produces 110 HP more power than Chevrolet Captiva, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Chevrolet Captiva. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-7 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Captiva is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda CX-7 consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-7 could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-7 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Captiva gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is larger, but lower. Mazda CX-7 is 4 cm longer than the Chevrolet Captiva, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-7 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 465 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 455 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
774 litres | 930 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space (by 10 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 156 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-7 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`301 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-7 has
|
Chevrolet Captiva has
| |