Mazda CX-7 2007 vs Honda CR-V 2007

 
Mazda CX-7
2007 - 2009
Honda CR-V
2007 - 2010
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.3 Petrol2.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 238 HP166 HP
Torque: 350 NM220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.3 seconds11 seconds
Mazda CX-7 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda CX-7 engine produces 72 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 130 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-7 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.59.5
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda CX-7 consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-7 could require 300 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 69 litres58 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 600 km in combined cycle610 km in combined cycle
740 km on highway780 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Dimensions

Length: 4.68 m4.52 m
Width: 1.87 m1.82 m
Height: 1.64 m1.68 m
Mazda CX-7 is larger, but slightly lower.
Mazda CX-7 is 16 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-7 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 400 litres556 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
774 litres955 litres
Honda CR-V has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda CX-7 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 181 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-7 is 1.4 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mazda CX-7 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 2`270 kg2`160 kg
Net weight:1`802 kg1`631 kg
Load capacity:468 kg529 kg
Mazda CX-7 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem less than Honda CR-V. Therefore, Honda CR-V is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 26004800
Rating in user reviews: 8.5/10 8.8/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-7 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Honda CR-V has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv