Mazda CX-7 2011 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2011

 
Mazda CX-7
2011 - 2012
Chevrolet Captiva
2011 - 2013
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 163 HP167 HP
Torque: 205 NM230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.3 seconds11 seconds
Mazda CX-7 engine produces 4 HP less power than Chevrolet Captiva, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Chevrolet Captiva. Despite less power, Mazda CX-7 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.49.3
Mazda CX-7 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-7 could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 69 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle
910 km on highway870 km on highway
Mazda CX-7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.68 m4.67 m
Width: 1.87 m1.85 m
Height: 1.65 m1.73 m
Mazda CX-7 is larger, but lower.
Mazda CX-7 and Chevrolet Captiva are practically the same length.
Seats: 5 seats7 seats
Trunk capacity: 455 litres97 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data97 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 455 litres477 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
774 litres1577 litres
In 5-seat version Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space (by 22 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 803 litres).
Turning diameter: no data12.3 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`0992`329
Safety:
Chevrolet Captiva scores higher in safety tests.
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 64007000
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-7 has
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Chevrolet Captiva has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • higher safety
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv