Mazda CX-7 2010 vs Hyundai ix35 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 227 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda CX-7 engine produces 61 HP more power than Hyundai ix35, whereas torque is 123 NM more than Hyundai ix35. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 | 9.2 | |
|
The Hyundai ix35 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-7 consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-7 could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai ix35 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 3 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai ix35 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mazda CX-7 2010 2.3 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its capacity is quite limited. The engine also requires high quality fuel and tends to use more oil at higher mileages. Hyundai ix35 2009 2.4 engine: Generally reliable and easy to maintain engine, with spare parts available. The engine is not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Although the manufacturer does not specify a chain change interval, it ... More about Hyundai ix35 2009 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda CX-7 is 27 cm longer than the Hyundai ix35, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-7 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
774 litres | 1436 litres | |
|
Hyundai ix35 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-7 has 136 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix35. This could mean that the Mazda CX-7 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai ix35 (by 662 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-7 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai ix35. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`289 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai ix35 scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-7 has
|
Hyundai ix35 has
| |