Mazda CX-7 2009 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 226 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-7 engine produces 86 HP more power than Hyundai Santa FE, whereas torque is 154 NM more than Hyundai Santa FE. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-7 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 8.7 | |
|
The Hyundai Santa FE is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-7 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-7 could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| Hyundai Santa FE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai Santa FE engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 3 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Santa FE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mazda CX-7 2009 2.3 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its capacity is quite limited. The engine also requires high quality fuel and tends to use more oil at higher mileages. Hyundai Santa FE 2010 2.4 engine: Generally reliable and easy to maintain engine, with spare parts available. The engine is not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Although the manufacturer does not specify a chain change interval, it ... More about Hyundai Santa FE 2010 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.73 m | |
| Mazda CX-7 is 4 cm longer than the Hyundai Santa FE, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-7 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 528 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
774 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-7 has 73 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Santa FE. This could mean that the Mazda CX-7 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-7 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Hyundai Santa FE, which means Mazda CX-7 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai Santa FE scores higher in safety tests. The Hyundai Santa FE scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-7 has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |