Mazda CX-7 2009 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-7 engine produces 23 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Despite the higher power, Mazda CX-7 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda CX-7 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-7 could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-7 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Nissan X-Trail 2010: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Nissan X-Trail engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is larger, but lower. Mazda CX-7 is 6 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 8 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-7 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
774 litres | 1773 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda CX-7 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 999 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-7 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`430 kg | 2`170 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`800 kg | 1`605 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 630 kg | 565 kg | |
| Mazda CX-7 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Mazda CX-7 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-7 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |