Mazda CX-7 2009 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-7 engine produces 1 HP less power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Nissan Pathfinder. Despite less power, Mazda CX-7 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda CX-7 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-7 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-7 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Pathfinder engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.78 m | |
| Mazda CX-7 is 4 cm shorter than the Nissan Pathfinder, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-7 is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 515 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
774 litres | 2091 litres | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder has more luggage space. Mazda CX-7 has 60 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Pathfinder. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 1317 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-7 is 1 metres less than that of the Nissan Pathfinder, which means Mazda CX-7 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`430 | 2`793 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-7 has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |