Mazda CX-7 2009 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-7 engine produces 17 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Despite the higher power, Mazda CX-7 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda CX-7 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-7 could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda CX-7 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda CX-7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Peugeot 4007, Citroen C-Crosser | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi Outlander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda CX-7 is 3 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-7 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 774 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
774 litres | 1691 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-7 has 319 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. This could mean that the Mazda CX-7 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 917 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-7 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Mazda CX-7 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`430 | 2`410 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-7 has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |