Mazda CX-7 2009 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-7 engine produces 23 HP more power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Mazda CX-5. Despite the higher power, Mazda CX-7 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda CX-7 consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-7 could require 435 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-7 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1210 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is larger, but lower. Mazda CX-7 is 16 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-7 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
774 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-7 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. This could mean that the Mazda CX-7 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 846 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-7 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`430 | 2`035 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda CX-5 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda CX-5 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-7 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |