Mazda CX-7 2009 vs Citroen C-Crosser 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-7 engine produces 17 HP more power than Citroen C-Crosser, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Citroen C-Crosser. Despite the higher power, Mazda CX-7 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda CX-7 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Crosser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-7 could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-7 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Crosser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda CX-7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C-Crosser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4007 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Citroen C-Crosser engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda CX-7 is 5 cm longer than the Citroen C-Crosser, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-7 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 184 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 184 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 455 litres | 441 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
774 litres | 1686 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Mazda CX-7 has more luggage space (by 14 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C-Crosser (by 912 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-7 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen C-Crosser, which means Mazda CX-7 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`430 | 2`410 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-7 has
|
Citroen C-Crosser has
| |