Mazda CX-7 2009 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 251 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-7 engine produces 10 HP more power than Chevrolet Captiva, whereas torque is 149 NM more than Chevrolet Captiva. Despite the higher power, Mazda CX-7 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Captiva is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda CX-7 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-7 could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-7 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Captiva gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is larger, but lower. Mazda CX-7 is 3 cm longer than the Chevrolet Captiva, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-7 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 477 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
774 litres | 1577 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-7 has 22 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Captiva. This could mean that the Mazda CX-7 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 803 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-7 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva, which means Mazda CX-7 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`430 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Chevrolet Captiva scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-7 has
|
Chevrolet Captiva has
| |