Mazda CX-7 2007 vs Mazda CX-7 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Mazda CX-7 2007 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda CX-7 2009 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda CX-7 2009 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
Engines: | 2.3 (petrol) | 2.2 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 238 - 260 HP | 163 - 260 HP | |
Torque: | 350 - 380 NM | 205 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 8.3 seconds | 8.2 - 11.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 - 11.5 | 7.5 - 11.5 | |
Mazda CX-7 2007 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-7 2009. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.68 m | 4.69 m | |
Width: | 1.87 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-7 2007 and Mazda CX-7 2009 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 455 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
774 litres | 774 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`286 | ~ 2`273 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 6200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-7 has
|
Mazda CX-7 has
| |