Mazda CX-7 2007 vs Honda CR-V 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda CX-7 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Honda CR-V also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.3 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Honda CR-V is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 - 260 HP | 140 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 - 380 NM | 192 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 8.3 seconds | 10.2 - 12.2 seconds | |
| In general, Mazda CX-7 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Honda CR-V. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 - 11.5 | 6.5 - 9.5 | |
|
Mazda CX-7 petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda CX-7 is 16 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-7 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
774 litres | 1532 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda CX-7 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 758 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-7 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mazda CX-7 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`286 kg | ~ 2`098 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`771 kg | ~ 1`556 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 515 kg | ~ 542 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 4000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-7 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |