Mazda CX-7 2007 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda CX-7 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan X-Trail can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan X-Trail also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.3 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 - 260 HP | 141 - 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 - 380 NM | 196 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 8.3 seconds | 9.8 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 - 11.5 | 7.1 - 9.6 | |
|
Mazda CX-7 petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda CX-7 is 5 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 9 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-7 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
774 litres | 1742 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-7 has 24 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. This could mean that the Mazda CX-7 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 968 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-7 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Mazda CX-7 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`286 | ~ 2`079 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 4600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-7 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |