Mazda CX-7 2009 vs Toyota RAV4 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.2 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 163 - 260 HP | 150 - 177 HP | |
Torque: | 205 - 400 NM | 198 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 11.3 seconds | 9.3 - 11 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 - 11.5 | 6.0 - 9.6 | |
Mazda CX-7 petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4. On average, Mazda CX-7 equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.69 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.87 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.65 m | 1.71 m | |
Mazda CX-7 is larger, but lower. Mazda CX-7 is 29 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-7 is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 586 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
774 litres | 1752 litres | |
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-7 has 131 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Mazda CX-7 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 978 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-7 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`273 | ~ 2`137 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 6200 | 9400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-7 has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |