Mazda CX-7 2009 vs Toyota RAV4 2010

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda CX-7
2009 - 2012
Toyota RAV4
2010 - 2013
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.2 - 2.52.0 - 2.4

Performance

Power: 163 - 260 HP150 - 177 HP
Torque: 205 - 400 NM198 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.2 - 11.3 seconds9.3 - 11 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.5 - 11.56.0 - 9.6
Mazda CX-7 petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4. On average, Mazda CX-7 equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.69 m4.39 m
Width: 1.87 m1.83 m
Height: 1.65 m1.71 m
Mazda CX-7 is larger, but lower.
Mazda CX-7 is 29 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-7 is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 455 litres586 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
774 litres1752 litres
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-7 has 131 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Mazda CX-7 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 978 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-7 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`273~ 2`137
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 64009800
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-7 has
  • lower price
Toyota RAV4 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv