Mazda CX-7 2009 vs Honda CR-V 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda CX-7 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda CX-7 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.2 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 260 HP | 150 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 - 400 NM | 192 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 11.3 seconds | 10.2 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 - 11.5 | 7.4 - 9.5 | |
|
Mazda CX-7 petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Mazda CX-7 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda CX-7 is 15 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-7 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 524 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
774 litres | no data | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-7 has 69 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Mazda CX-7 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-7 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mazda CX-7 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`273 | ~ 2`097 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-7 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |