Mazda CX-7 2009 vs Honda CR-V 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda CX-7 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda CX-7 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.2 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 260 HP | 150 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 - 400 NM | 192 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 11.3 seconds | 9.6 - 12.2 seconds | |
| In general, Mazda CX-7 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Honda CR-V. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 - 11.5 | 6.5 - 9.5 | |
|
Mazda CX-7 petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Mazda CX-7 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda CX-7 is 14 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-7 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 524 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
774 litres | 1532 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda CX-7 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 758 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-7 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mazda CX-7 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`273 kg | ~ 2`113 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`801 kg | ~ 1`684 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 472 kg | ~ 429 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-7 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |