Mazda 626 2000 vs Mazda 6 2013
| Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 218 NM | 256 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 626 engine produces 25 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 38 NM less than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 62 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 626 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda Xedos 9, Mazda MX-6 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda CX-5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is smaller. Mazda 626 is 6 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 454 litres | 502 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. Mazda 626 has 48 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 1.4 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`040 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |