Mazda 626 1995 vs Mazda 626 1991

 
Mazda 626
1995 - 1997
Mazda 626
1991 - 1995
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 117 HP117 HP
Torque: 173 NM173 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.1 seconds12.4 seconds
Mazda 626 1995 and Mazda 626 1991 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mazda 626 1995 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.38.5
Mazda 626 1995 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626 1991, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 1995 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 520'000 km520'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 6 years6 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m4.70 m
Width: 1.75 m1.75 m
Height: 1.40 m1.39 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 626 1995 and Mazda 626 1991 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 452 litres455 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data747 litres
Mazda 626 1995 has 3 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626 1991.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`650no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 600600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 626 has
  • lower price
Mazda 626 has
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv