Mazda 626 1995 vs Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 280 HP | |
| Torque: | 173 NM | 372.6 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda 626 engine produces 163 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, whereas torque is 199.6 NM less than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 10.0 | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 626 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 500 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 626 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda MX-6 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
| Mazda 626 is 35 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
| |