Mazda 626 1995 vs Mazda Xedos 9 1993
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 173 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Mazda Xedos 9 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 626 engine produces 29 HP less power than Mazda Xedos 9, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Mazda Xedos 9. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 8.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.3 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda Xedos 9 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mazda 626 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Xedos 9, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 626 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Xedos 9. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 530 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda Xedos 9 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 626 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda MX-6 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Xedos 6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda Xedos 9 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is smaller. Mazda 626 is 12 cm shorter than the Mazda Xedos 9, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | 430 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 626 has 22 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Xedos 9. The Mazda Xedos 9 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mazda Xedos 9, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Mazda Xedos 9 has
| |