Mazda 626 1995 vs Mazda 626 1991
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 173 NM | 173 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
| Mazda 626 1995 and Mazda 626 1991 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mazda 626 1995 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 626 1995 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 626 1995 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626 1991, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 1995 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 626 1995 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626 1991. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 626 1995 and Mazda 626 1991 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 747 litres | |
| Mazda 626 1995 has 3 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626 1991. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`645 | 1`675 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
| |