Mazda 626 1995 vs Hyundai Lantra 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 173 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Mazda 626 engine produces 3 HP more power than Hyundai Lantra, whereas torque is 28 NM more than Hyundai Lantra. Despite the higher power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 626 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Lantra, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 626 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda MX-6 | Used also on Hyundai Coupe | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is larger. Mazda 626 is 28 cm longer than the Hyundai Lantra, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | 393 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 626 has 59 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Lantra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Hyundai Lantra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`645 | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mazda 626 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Lantra has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
| |