Mazda 626 1995 vs Ford Mondeo 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 173 NM | 176 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 626 engine produces 14 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 626 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 626 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda MX-6 | Used also on Ford Scorpio | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.37 m | |
| Mazda 626 is 14 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 626 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1290 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda 626 has 8 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. This could mean that the Mazda 626 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`645 | 1`815 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Mazda 626 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |