Mazda 626 1995 vs Ford Mondeo 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 173 NM | 158 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 626 engine produces 1 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Thanks to more power Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda 626 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 626 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.37 m | |
| Mazda 626 is 14 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 626 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1290 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 626 has 28 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. This could mean that the Mazda 626 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`645 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Mazda 626 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |