Mazda 626 1995 vs Audi A6 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 173 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 626 engine produces 16 HP more power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Audi A6. Thanks to more power Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.3 | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 626 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 626 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda MX-6 | Used also on Audi 100 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is smaller. Mazda 626 is 10 cm shorter than the Audi A6, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | 510 litres | |
|
Audi A6 has more luggage space. Mazda 626 has 58 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Audi A6, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`645 | 1`895 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Mazda 626 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi A6 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Audi A6 has
| |