Mazda 626 1995 vs Audi A4 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 173 NM | 140 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 626 engine produces 16 HP more power than Audi A4, whereas torque is 33 NM more than Audi A4. Thanks to more power Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
| By specification Mazda 626 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A4, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda MX-6 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 626 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 626 is 22 cm longer than the Audi A4, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | 440 litres | |
| Mazda 626 has 12 litres more trunk space than the Audi A4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Audi A4, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`645 | 1`745 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Mazda 626 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi A4 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 7.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
| |