Mazda 626 1995 vs Audi 80 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 173 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 626 engine produces 1 HP more power than Audi 80, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Audi 80. Thanks to more power Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 626 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 626 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda MX-6 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi 100 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi 80 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 626 is 22 cm longer than the Audi 80, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 710 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 626 has 22 litres more trunk space than the Audi 80. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Audi 80, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`645 | 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Mazda 626 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi 80 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Audi 80 has
| |