Mazda 626 1995 vs Chrysler Stratus 1995
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 117 HP | 161 HP | |
Torque: | 173 NM | 218 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Chrysler Stratus is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 626 engine produces 44 HP less power than Chrysler Stratus, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Chrysler Stratus. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 10.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 626 consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Stratus, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 626 consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Stratus. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
740 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.70 m | 4.75 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.37 m | |
Mazda 626 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 626 is 5 cm shorter than the Chrysler Stratus, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Chrysler Stratus, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`645 | 1`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Chrysler Stratus has
| |