Mazda 626 1995 vs Chrysler Stratus 1995

 
Mazda 626
1995 - 1997
Chrysler Stratus
1995 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 117 HP161 HP
Torque: 173 NM218 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 seconds10.5 seconds
Chrysler Stratus is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 626 engine produces 44 HP less power than Chrysler Stratus, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Chrysler Stratus. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.710.7
Real fuel consumption: 8.1 l/100km10.8 l/100km
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 626 consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Stratus, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 626 consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Stratus.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle560 km in combined cycle
740 km with real consumption550 km with real consumption
Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m4.75 m
Width: 1.75 m1.82 m
Height: 1.40 m1.37 m
Mazda 626 is smaller, but slightly higher.
Mazda 626 is 5 cm shorter than the Chrysler Stratus, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 452 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Chrysler Stratus, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6451`200
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 600600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 626 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Chrysler Stratus has
  • more power
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv